Why use this plugin instead of the built in file plugin?
Open
- Dominant language
- Go
- Stars
- 10
- Forks
- 9
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
Is it just the "inline" aspect of the configuration? Or are there other features (like the optional SOA?)
If _file_ supported inline configuration, could we deprecate _records_?
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
Research direction
Start by comparing the records plugin with CoreDNS's built-in file plugin, focusing on inline configuration and the optional SOA feature mentioned in the issue. Done means reaching and documenting a clear decision about whether file should gain inline support and whether records could then be deprecated.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- go
- Domain
- networking
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100