conductor-oss / conductor-oss/getting-started
conductoross/conductor-standalone on Docker Hub is 2+ years stale and has more pulls than the current image
- Dominant language
- No language data
- Stars
- 2
- Forks
- 1
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
## Problem
There are two images in the `conductoross` Docker Hub namespace:
| Image | Latest tag | Last updated | Pulls |
|-------|-----------|--------------|-------|
| `conductoross/conductor` | `3.22.3` | 2026-03-18 | 4,268 |
| `conductoross/conductor-standalone` | `3.15.0` | 2023-12-13 | 4,977 |
`conductor-standalone` is described as *"A standalone container for running Conductor OSS on your local machine"* — exactly what a new user is looking for. It has **more pulls than the current image** but is over 2 years out of date (3.15.0 vs 3.22.3 current).
A new user searching Docker Hub for Conductor, or following an old blog post or Stack Overflow answer, will likely land on `conductor-standalone` and run a badly outdated server without knowing it.
## Options
1. **Deprecate/delete it** — add a deprecation notice pointing to `conductoross/conductor:latest`, then archive or delete the repo
2. **Revive it** — if there's value in a "batteries-included" local-dev image (bundled UI, SQLite, no external deps), start publishing it again on the release cadence
## Affects
- Docker Hub `conductoross/conductor-standalone`
- Any docs, blog posts, or external links referencing the standalone image
Note: There are also confusing images also in orkes-conductor...
These "community" images are also confusing the overall namespace of docker OSS in general.
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
Assessment
This issue has not been assessed yet.