Provide a section/recommendation to institutions/review boards
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Shell
- Stars
- 45
- Forks
- 37
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
In which we could recommend
- (re)use the ultimate consent form wording, or some other "popular" wording, and do not reinvent the wheel. The same as it goes with software/data licenses -- do not come up with custom ones
- share your consent form, versioned, on some public documents archive with a persistent identified (DOI, PURL, HAL, see https://github.com/datalad/open-brain-consent/issues/16#issuecomment-366589849)
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
No target file, section, or test is named. Start by locating the project's documentation entry point and reviewing the related discussion in issue #16; done means documenting the proposed consent-form reuse and persistent-archive recommendations in an agreed section.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Domain
- documentation
- Issue type
- Documentation
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100