con / con/ference

Crowdcast pros/cons

Open
#2 5 comments 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub
audio/video interaction
Dominant language
No language data
Stars
13
Forks
0
PR merge metrics
No merged PRs in 30d

Description

Pros
- casts to hundreds (thousands?) of participants
- has chat
- emoticons in the chat but IIRC as a separate post (ideally better be like mattermost emoticons per post)
- makes video record of the event to share later
- every participant it's just a participant of chat without audio/video unless invited
- built in polls
- built in q&a

Cons
- closed paid service
- limits to up to 4 active invited participants. Mitigated by starting zoom and sharing the screen. Cons: those who share can't see chat, those who participated have audio/video mismatch unless mute crowdcast (if I got it right)
- chat log, q&a, polls doesn't seem to have a permanent url
- chat is rudimentary, Afaik no `@references` (and to associate response with a particular comment) supported

Pros/cons (feature which might be needed)
- allows (or requires?) authorized (login/password) to access

Contributor guide

No contributing guide indexed for this repository

Assessment

This issue has not been assessed yet.

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.