commoncriteria / commoncriteria/transforms
Define f-component without f-elements
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- XSLT
- Stars
- 1
- Forks
- 4
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
In some cases we want to be able to put freeform text underneath a component header without any elements in the SFR. Most notably this is the case in PP-Modules where the Modified SFRs section has an SFR that is not changed from its literal definition, but its status has.
For example, a note may exist along the lines of "This SFR is selection-based in the Base-PP but it is mandatory when the TOE conforms to this PP-Module."
Right now we just put text like this under the .1 f-element but it could be misleading to readers who may think these notes are meant to be literal SFR text.
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
No file, test, or entry point is named in the issue. Begin by finding the transform or schema handling component headers and f-elements, then confirm completion when freeform text can appear beneath a header without an f-element and is not presented as literal SFR text.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- xml
- Domain
- tooling
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 42/100