commoncriteria / commoncriteria/transforms

more granularity in management function tables

Open
#138 0 comments 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

enhancement
Dominant language
XSLT
Stars
1
Forks
4
PR merge metrics
No merged PRs in 30d

Description

Much like SFRs distinguish between optional and selection-based where the latter is compelled, the construct for the management functions table would benefit from having a letter other than O to refer to the situation where a management function is conditionally mandatory (e.g. include if some selection is made, include if some SFR is claimed, exactly one role must be authorized to do this but we don't care which one).

Contributor guide

No contributing guide indexed for this repository

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

Research direction

Start by reviewing how management function tables represent optional entries and how SFRs distinguish optional from selection-based requirements. Define the representation needed for conditionally mandatory management functions, including the examples in the issue, and confirm that the resulting construct covers each stated case.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Domain
tooling
Issue type
Feature
Difficulty
5/5
Estimated time
Over a week
Activity status
Stale
Clarity
Needs clarification
Newbie friendliness
35/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.