commoncriteria / commoncriteria/fileencryption
APP -> MDF FMT requirements
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Makefile
- Stars
- 2
- Forks
- 3
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
Using the MDF as the base, FMT_MEC_EXT.1 and FMT_CFG_EXT.1 would not be needed since it is a managed device and the software is a part of the TOE and so should be managed (this is my expectation anyway).
FMT_SMF.1 requirements in the App do not seem to be anything that need specifically to be added in addition to the MDF FMT_SMF requirements.
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Compare the APP and MDF FMT requirements, focusing on FMT_MEC_EXT.1, FMT_CFG_EXT.1, and FMT_SMF.1. Confirm whether the APP requirements are necessary or duplicate the MDF, then update the requirements and record the resulting rationale.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Domain
- documentation
- Issue type
- Documentation
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100