commoncriteria / commoncriteria/bluetooth
v2 - FTP_BLT_EXT.3, does this need to be separate?
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Makefile
- Stars
- 3
- Forks
- 0
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
As LE was introduced with v4.0 of the BT spec, it isn't clear, in 2026 that it is necessary to split them into two separate requirements given they are exactly the same. It would seem better to combine them into a single SFR and let the vendor provide any details about different key sizes in the assignment and the TSS.
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Review the BT specification sections defining FTP_BLT_EXT.3 and its LE counterpart. Determine whether they should become one SFR, including how different key sizes would be handled in the assignment and TSS.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Domain
- documentation
- Issue type
- Refactor
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100