commoncriteria / commoncriteria/authserver
Comment on FIA_HOTP_EXT.1
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Makefile
- Stars
- 0
- Forks
- 0
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
The following comment on FIA_HOTP_EXT.1 remains open and has been reproduced here for tracking purposes:
Discuss how much detail from the RFC is embedded in SFR elements (ok for testing, but this seems redundant, should elements be reserved for refinements of the RFC?
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start by reviewing FIA_HOTP_EXT.1 and the RFC detail embedded in its SFR elements. Compare that detail with the purpose of SFR refinements, then document whether the duplicated material should remain; done means the open comment has a clear, agreed resolution.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Domain
- authentication
- Issue type
- Documentation
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100