Improve package naming convention
Open
- Dominant language
- C++
- Stars
- 53
- Forks
- 47
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
We are currently using a very coarse algorithm to compute package names. In #161, @svigerske indicated a preferred solution:
https://github.com/coin-or/CoinUtils/pull/161#issuecomment-829232628
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
Research direction
Start by reading the discussion on #161, especially the linked comment, then locate the current package-name computation in CoinUtils. Compare its behavior with the preferred solution described there. Done means the coarse naming behavior has been replaced with the preferred convention.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- cpp
- Domain
- build-system
- Issue type
- Refactor
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100