User testing "do-outs" to improve

Full document: https://docs.google.com/document/d/12EhDi9mjaw8ucwETHVALSEWOf0KgHDdsBh8DVd2SCGM/edit

Do-outs from 6/3 prelim testing (from @annemeeker):
Better explanatory text in the results card - define terms, explain what they are
- [ ] 1 Add an instruction to double-check the uploaded earnings record to make sure it looks correct
- [ ] 2. Instructions text on top of the sliders
- [ ] 3. Make it clear that you have to enter the amt of your pension (and we need to have the lump sum vs. monthly broken out)
- [ ] 4. Add a screen where we can add in the ‘political action’ etc points?
- [x] 5. Is it calculating AIME from the XML file? Didn’t change in the 3 user tests, but I was using the same numbers
- [x] 6. Can we change auto-fill from specific numbers to zeros?
- [x] 7. Let’s follow up on Sebastian’s flag that the AIME might not be working
- [x] 8. Breadcrumbs with the graphic take-people-through
- [x] 9. (Delete the page that needs deleting - the MPB one)
- [x] 10. Buttons for text size/high contrast - next to hamburger menu? Text enlarging?

Start with the linked full document and review the existing results card, sliders, pension-entry flow, and upload instructions. The unchecked items define the remaining work; confirm which are still relevant, then verify that each requested explanation or input flow is present and understandable.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.