codecheckers / codecheckers/paper
CODCHECK vs. NISO badges recommendations
Open
- Dominant language
- TeX
- Stars
- 2
- Forks
- 0
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
[Just noting this here if there is a revision made.]
https://doi.org/10.3789/niso-rp-31-2021
It's a pity that they have `ROR-R` (reproduced) only as an extension of `ROR` (reviewed), whereas CODECHECK does reproduction without too much code review. _Could go into future work?_
Also, the idea to add a crpytographic hash in the image header for authentication of the badge source is interesting, but would require an own badge server.
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
Assessment
This issue has not been assessed yet.