codecheckers / codecheckers/discussion

Can CODECHECK be a starting point for curation of reproducible research?

Open
#31 0 comments 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub
connections question
Dominant language
No language data
Stars
0
Forks
0
PR merge metrics
No merged PRs in 30d

Description

> Arguillas, Florio, Christian, Thu-Mai, Gooch, Mandy, Honeyman, Tom, Peer, Limor, & CURE-FAIR WG. (2022). 10 Things for Curating Reproducible and FAIR Research (1.1). https://doi.org/10.15497/RDA00074

![image](https://github.com/codecheckers/discussion/assets/1325054/1f0e4298-a5be-4397-819c-0613442bad1f)

**10 Things for Curating Reproducible and FAIR Research**

- Thing 1: Completeness
- Thing 2: Organization
- Thing 3: Economy
- Thing 4: Transparency
- Thing 5: Documentation
- Thing 6: Access
- Thing 7: Provenance
- Thing 8: Metadata
- Thing 9: Automation
- Thing 10: Review

_How can CODECHECK procedures, with not too much overhead, positively impact things that help curation of reproducible research?_

Contributor guide

No contributing guide indexed for this repository

Assessment

This issue has not been assessed yet.

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.