codecheckers / codecheckers/discussion
Reproducibility policy Ecological Society of America
- Dominant language
- No language data
- Stars
- 0
- Forks
- 0
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
Maybe an interesting collaboration partner for CODECHECK:
> The Ecological Society of America (9000 members, 6 journals with its publishing partner, Wiley) has just today announced an open research policy for its publications. Here is is the key part of the policy:
>
> _"As a condition for publication in ESA journals, all underlying data and statistical code pertinent to the results presented in the publication must be made available in a permanent, publicly accessible data archive or repository, with rare exceptions (see “Details” for more information). Archived data and statistical code should be sufficiently complete to allow replication of tables, graphs, and statistical analyses reported in the original publication, and perform new or meta-analyses. As such, the desire of authors to control additional research with these data and/or code shall not be grounds for withholding material."_
>
> Blog post of the announcement: https://www.esa.org/esablog/2021/01/28/esa-data-policy-ensuring-an-openness-to-science/
>
> Details of the policy and resources to assist authors: https://www.esa.org/publications/data-policy/
via @benmarwick :bowing_man:
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
Research direction
Read the linked ESA blog post and policy details first. The issue mentions no repository files, tests, or concrete change; clarify whether the project should pursue a collaboration before defining what completion would mean.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Domain
- documentation
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 20/100