code-chronicles-code / code-chronicles-code/leetcode-curriculum

Re-implement and enhance `check-formatting.yml` Github Actions workflow as a Node script

Open
#226 0 comments 0 reactions 1 assignee Claimed by @miorel View on GitHub
enhancement
Dominant language
TypeScript
Stars
20
Forks
12
PR merge metrics
No merged PRs in 30d

Description

The workflow introduced in #225 is currently powered by a shell command, namely `yarn format && git status --porcelain` piped through some not very easy to maintain inline Perl.

Let's rewrite this as a Node script that's more maintainable. This is also an opportunity to address the other TODO in the workflow file, and have it output a summary as described at https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/workflow-commands-for-github-actions#adding-a-job-summary

The general behavior of the workflow should be:
1. Run `yarn format` to rewrite any files that are not correctly formatted. This part can still happen outside Node, so for example the command we run becomes something like `yarn format && node some-script.js`.
2. The script basically replaces the `git status --porcelain` part and the subsequent Perl expression it's piped into. The script should therefore still run `git status --porcelain` from within Node and capture the output.
3. For each line in the output of `git status --porcelain`, the script should remove the first 3 characters (see explanation of the format at https://git-scm.com/docs/git-status#_porcelain_format_version_1 to understand why) to get only the filename. It should then output an error message (using the format described at https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/workflow-commands-for-github-actions#setting-an-error-message) to indicate that the file in question doesn't respect the repository's formatting rules.
4. For bonus points (this part can be done as a separate PR) output a markdown summary at the end.
5. If there were any files that were improperly formatted, the script should exit with a non-zero exit code so that the check fails and draws the attention of the author and reviewers.

Contributor guide

Open the contributing guide

Assessment

This issue has not been assessed yet.

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.