cncf / cncf/open-community-groups
Support publishing content for groups
- Dominant language
- PLpgSQL
- Stars
- 72
- Forks
- 31
- Avg merge
- 12h 44m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 26
Description
On the previous CNCF community platform (Bevy), Merge Forward actively used content publishing to share key information with the community.
This included:
- Governance and roles
- Contribution opportunities
- Community guidelines and best practices
- Communication and marketing resources
Examples of previously published content:
- Merge Forward Messaging Guide
- Merge Forward Community Partnership
- Non-Code Opportunity: Digital Marketing Core Contributor
- Merge Forward Marketing Kit
- Collaboration Best Practices
- Merge Forward Roles & Responsibilities
- Merge Forward Community Manager
- Contributor Wanted: Mentorship Program
- KubeCon Onsite Activities Coordinator
- Contributors Wanted: Active Members
- KubeCon Amsterdam CfP Coordinator
References available from the previous platform:
https://community.cncf.io/v0/forum/merge-forward-working-group-1864/
**Current Situation on Open Community Groups**
There is currently no way to publish and organize this type of structured, persistent content within a group.
As a result:
- Important community resources cannot be shared in a centralized place
- Knowledge is fragmented across external tools (Google Docs, Slack, etc.)
- New contributors lack a single entry point to understand the initiative
**Why this matters**
For initiatives like Merge Forward, content publishing is essential to:
- Communicate governance
→ Roles, responsibilities, and how the group operates
- Enable onboarding at scale
→ Contributors can self-serve information without requiring synchronous support
- Promote contribution opportunities
→ Clear visibility on how to get involved (especially for non-code contributors)
- Ensure transparency and alignment
→ Shared understanding of goals, strategy, and ongoing initiatives
- Reduce dependency on synchronous tools (e.g., Slack)
→ Persistent, structured knowledge is critical for asynchronous collaboration
**Without this capability**
- Community growth slows down
- Contributor experience degrades
- Operational overhead increases for maintainers
- Important knowledge becomes hard to find or maintain
**Feature Request:**
Introduce a way for groups to publish and manage structured static content pages: knowledge base, documentation style.
**Key capabilities**
- Create and organize posts/pages within a group
- Categorize content (e.g., governance, opportunities, resources)
- Provide persistent URLs for sharing
- Allow updates and versioning over time
**Expected Outcome**
- Centralized and structured community knowledge
- Improved onboarding and contributor experience
- Better visibility of opportunities and governance
- Reduced reliance on external tools
- Stronger, more scalable community operations
Happy to share more concrete workflows or examples of how we used this in practice if helpful.
Contributor guide
Assessment
This issue has not been assessed yet.