Question: Can Percona add a second entry for Percona Operators alongside existing Percona Server for MySQL?
- Dominant language
- No language data
- Stars
- 10k
- Forks
- 2.2k
- Avg merge
- 2d 1h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 71
Description
Hi! I'm a CNCF Ambassador working on the Percona Operators team. Percona is a Silver CNCF member currently listed in the Database category with [Percona Server for MySQL](https://landscape.cncf.io/?item=app-definition-and-development--database--percona-server-for-mysql).
I'd like to explore adding a separate entry for Percona Operators; four open source [Kubernetes Operators ](https://github.com/orgs/percona/projects/10/views/1)for MongoDB, MySQL, and PostgreSQL and XtraDB Cluster. We'd use additional_repos to reference all four operator repositories under one entry, and all four operators share a single unified logo.
Here is the proposed entry:
```
- item:
name: Percona Kubernetes Operators
description: >-
Open source Percona Kubernetes Operators for managing MongoDB, MySQL,
PostgreSQL and XtraDB Cluster databases on Kubernetes.
homepage_url: https://www.percona.com/software/percona-kubernetes-operators
repo_url: https://github.com/percona/percona-server-mongodb-operator
additional_repos:
- repo_url: https://github.com/percona/percona-postgresql-operator
- repo_url: https://github.com/percona/percona-xtradb-cluster-operator
- repo_url: https://github.com/percona/percona-server-mysql-operator
logo: percona-operators.svg
crunchbase: https://www.crunchbase.com/organization/percona
extra:
tag: app-delivery
```
Would this qualify as a second entry alongside the existing listing?
Or would you prefer we replace it?
I would greatly appreciate your guidance on the best approach before I proceed with a PR. Thank you for your support!
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
Assessment
This issue has not been assessed yet.