cloudfoundry / cloudfoundry/cloud_controller_ng
Includes for service instances
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Ruby
- Stars
- 207
- Forks
- 373
- Avg merge
- 2d 12h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 56
Description
Is there any reason why there are no includes for service instances?
This would save tons of calls. Eg python client doesn't seem to support fields https://github.com/cloudfoundry-community/cf-python-client/issues/247
If orgs, spaces or even apps would be possible to be included my small benchmark mentioned here https://github.com/cloudfoundry-community/cf-python-client/issues/218#issuecomment-2402065061 would also apply for service instances.
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
The issue names no Cloud Controller files, tests, or entry points. Start by reviewing how API includes are handled for service instances, then compare the behavior described in the linked Python client issues and benchmark. Done would require an agreed scope for including orgs, spaces, or apps and corresponding implementation and tests.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- ruby
- Domain
- api, backend
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100