cloudfoundry / cloudfoundry/cf-java-client
Feature request: Add support for arbitrary parameters when binding services via manifest.yml
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Java
- Stars
- 334
- Forks
- 319
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
Hello,
I want to report this error when we push an app manifest with binding parameters. It seems that the manifest yaml doesn't get parsed correctly because the format is not supported
java.lang.ClassCastException: Cannot cast java.util.LinkedHashMap to java.lang.String
at java.lang.Class.cast(Class.java:3369)
at java.util.stream.ReferencePipeline$3$1.accept(ReferencePipeline.java:193)
at java.util.ArrayList$ArrayListSpliterator.forEachRemaining(ArrayList.java:1382)
at java.util.stream.AbstractPipeline.copyInto(AbstractPipeline.java:482)
at java.util.stream.AbstractPipeline.wrapAndCopyInto(AbstractPipeline.java:472)
at java.util.stream.ForEachOps$ForEachOp.evaluateSequential(ForEachOps.java:150)
at java.util.stream.ForEachOps$ForEachOp$OfRef.evaluateSequential(ForEachOps.java:173)
at java.util.stream.AbstractPipeline.evaluate(AbstractPipeline.java:234)
at java.util.stream.ReferencePipeline.forEach(ReferencePipeline.java:485)
at org.cloudfoundry.operations.applications.ApplicationManifestUtils.lambda$asList$2(ApplicationManifestUtils.java:160)
at java.util.Optional.ifPresent(Optional.java:159)
at org.cloudfoundry.operations.applications.ApplicationManifestUtils.as(ApplicationManifestUtils.java:131)
at org.cloudfoundry.operations.applications.ApplicationManifestUtils.asList(ApplicationManifestUtils.java:157)
at org.cloudfoundry.operations.applications.ApplicationManifestUtils.asListOfString(ApplicationManifestUtils.java:164)
at org.cloudfoundry.operations.applications.ApplicationManifestUtils.toApplicationManifest(ApplicationManifestUtils.java:346)
at org.cloudfoundry.operations.applications.ApplicationManifestUtils.lambda$doRead$9(ApplicationManifestUtils.java:236)
at java.util.stream.ReferencePipeline$3$1.accept(ReferencePipeline.java:193)
at java.util.ArrayList$ArrayListSpliterator.forEachRemaining(ArrayList.java:1382)
at java.util.stream.AbstractPipeline.copyInto(AbstractPipeline.java:482)
at java.util.stream.AbstractPipeline.wrapAndCopyInto(AbstractPipeline.java:472)
at java.util.stream.ReduceOps$ReduceOp.evaluateSequential(ReduceOps.java:708)
at java.util.stream.AbstractPipeline.evaluate(AbstractPipeline.java:234)
at java.util.stream.ReferencePipeline.collect(ReferencePipeline.java:566)
at org.cloudfoundry.operations.applications.ApplicationManifestUtils.doRead(ApplicationManifestUtils.java:240)
at org.cloudfoundry.operations.applications.ApplicationManifestUtils.read(ApplicationManifestUtils.java:73)
at org.cloudfoundry.operations.applications.ApplicationManifestUtils$read.call(Unknown Source)
at org.codehaus.groovy.runtime.callsite.CallSiteArray.defaultCall(CallSiteArray.java:45)
at org.codehaus.groovy.runtime.callsite.AbstractCallSite.call(AbstractCallSite.java:108)
at org.codehaus.groovy.runtime.callsite.AbstractCallSite.call(AbstractCallSite.java:116)
Manifest format:
---
applications:
- name: my-app
services:
- name: my-service1
parameters:
foo: bar
herp: derp
- name: my-service2
parameters:
foo: bar
For more details on the binding params please read: https://docs.cloudfoundry.org/devguide/services/application-binding.html#-binding-with-application-manifest
Best regards.
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start with ApplicationManifestUtils, especially asList, asListOfString, and toApplicationManifest, using the supplied manifest as the reproduction case. Trace how service binding parameters are converted and verify that nested parameter mappings parse without the reported ClassCastException while preserving their values.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- java
- Domain
- api, cloud
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 3/5
- Estimated time
- 1-2 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100