clockworklabs / clockworklabs/SpacetimeDB
Namespace support proposal
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Rust
- Stars
- 25.2k
- Forks
- 1.1k
- Avg merge
- 2d 7h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 46
Description
This issue tracks reimplementing the work from stale PR #4303, which has been closed because it is too far out of date to merge directly.
Original pull request
- PR #4303: Namespace proposal - first draft
- Original author: @aasoni
What the original PR was trying to do
Description of Changes API and ABI breaking changes Expected complexity level and risk Testing - [ ] - [ ]
Closure context
- @aasoni Closing this and going to create a ticket to track this.
Reimplementation notes
- Reimplement this work on top of current
masterin a new PR. - Keep the original PR linked as historical context and as a source of useful implementation ideas where still relevant.
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start by reading PR #4303 and comparing its proposal with the current master branch; this issue names no implementation files or tests. Establish the current namespace-support scope and acceptance criteria, then validate the reimplementation in a new PR against master.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- rust
- Domain
- databases
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Quiet
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100