clockworklabs / clockworklabs/SpacetimeDB
Comparison to tigerbeetle
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Rust
- Stars
- 25.2k
- Forks
- 1.1k
- Avg merge
- 2d 7h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 46
Description
Your performance numbers are very impressive, especially for a general-purpose db, but the accounting transactions reminded me of tigerbeetle. Any chance you could add it to the performance comparisons?
SpacetimeDB and tigerbeetle of course have very different capabilities and goals, but a performance comparison would nonetheless be very interesting to me!
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
The issue does not name files, tests, or entry points. Start by locating the existing performance comparison or benchmark setup, then determine how TigerBeetle could be measured alongside SpacetimeDB. Done means a documented, reproducible comparison is added to the existing performance results.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- rust
- Domain
- databases, performance
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 3/5
- Estimated time
- 1-2 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100