clearlydefined / clearlydefined/service
[ruby] Should be OR'ing licenses
Open
Declared License Issue
enhancement
question
- Dominant language
- TypeScript
- Stars
- 51
- Forks
- 46
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
For https://clearlydefined.io/definitions/gem/rubygems/-/rabbitmq_http_api_client/1.11.0 we're discovering both MIT and NOASSSERTION. We think we should be OR'ing them and we're not.
@dabutvin
Contributor guide
Research direction
Start by reproducing the ClearlyDefined definition for rabbitmq_http_api_client 1.11.0 from the linked URL, then trace the service's license processing for the MIT and NOASSSERTION results. Done means the definition represents those licenses as an OR relationship rather than leaving them separate or uncombined.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- ruby, typescript
- Domain
- backend
- Issue type
- Bug
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100