ckan / ckan/ckanext-scheming

Feature idea: Per-field validation for multiple_text

Open
#276 2 comments 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub
Dominant language
Python
Stars
102
Forks
182
PR merge metrics
No merged PRs in 30d

Description

- need to decide how to report multiple errors and highlight the correct fields in the form
- do we allow customization of the validation or create a bunch of separate presets `multiple_url`, `multiple_email` and so on

Contributor guide

No contributing guide indexed for this repository

Research direction

Start by locating the existing multiple_text validation entry point and reviewing how form errors are currently reported. Clarify whether multiple errors need separate field highlighting and whether validation should be customizable or exposed through presets such as multiple_url and multiple_email; the work is done when those choices are specified and implemented consistently.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Tech stack
python
Domain
backend
Issue type
Feature
Difficulty
5/5
Estimated time
Over a week
Activity status
Stale
Clarity
Needs clarification
Newbie friendliness
25/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.