ckan / ckan/ckanext-scheming

PACKAGE_FORM

Open
#138 2 comments 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

Dominant language
Python
Stars
102
Forks
182
PR merge metrics
No merged PRs in 30d

Description

I am trying to add further functionality to the scheming extension and would thus require to provide a modified package_form template in my own extension.

However, it seems to be impossible to get CKAN to recognize any other package_form besides the one in the scheming extension when using it.

Could you provide an hint how to do it?

Contributor guide

No contributing guide indexed for this repository

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

Research direction

Start by tracing how CKAN and the scheming extension select the package_form template, then reproduce the issue with a separate extension. Done means a custom package_form template supplied by another extension is recognized instead of only the scheming template.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Tech stack
python
Domain
frontend
Issue type
Feature
Difficulty
3/5
Estimated time
1-2 days
Activity status
Stale
Clarity
Needs clarification
Newbie friendliness
35/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.