maintenance_max_adaptive_executor_pool_size?
Open
- Dominant language
- C
- Stars
- 12.8k
- Forks
- 794
- Avg merge
- 2d 14h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 31
Description
Commands like 'CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY' might take much longer than other queries. If they use the default 16, then each worker loses significant number of connections for a long time and might interfere with performance of other queries. Should we use a different pool size for these kind of commands?
Contributor guide
Assessment
This issue has not been assessed yet.