chakravala / chakravala/Geophysics.jl
Is the name of this package appropriate?
- Dominant language
- Julia
- Stars
- 12
- Forks
- 0
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
Continuing a discussion in the announcement post https://discourse.julialang.org/t/ann-geophysics-jl/49097 :
> Isn’t the name of this package overly general and could even miss-lead a newcomer? I’d say Geophysics is a really large branch of the geosciences, but this package seems to focus specifically on providing values of pressure, temperature and other variables of the atmosphere at a given height. Wouldn’t a more fitting name be something like Atmospheres.jl or AtmosphericVariables.jl?
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
Research direction
Start with the linked Discourse announcement and the package description to understand the current atmospheric scope and the naming concern. No repository file or test is identified; done would require a maintainer decision on whether the package name accurately reflects its scope, followed by any agreed rename work.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- julia
- Domain
- data
- Issue type
- Refactor
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100