[Suggestion] 是否可以设置对网站进行放宽安全行为
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Go
- Stars
- 22.6k
- Forks
- 1.5k
- Avg merge
- 4h 30m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 11
Description
What would you like to be added or improved?
你好，我是雷池资深用户。我最近发现使用 雷池代理http请求的时候效果很好。但是如果我的页面上有视频流或者是个传输文件的网站，就会十分卡顿。比如如果我搭建一个sftpgo，然后使用雷池代理发布到公网上，上传下载是非常慢的。而不使用雷池则很快
Why is it needed?
我已经测试关闭了安全防护，但是发现没有效果，是否能请研发大佬看看是为什么？
情景复现：
搭建sftpgo，有web页面，使用雷池做了反向代理之后，上传下载文件非常卡顿。
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Reproduce the reported setup with SFTPGo behind SafeLine and compare upload and download speed with direct access and with security protection disabled. Start by tracing the reverse-proxy path involved in file transfers; done means identifying why throughput is degraded and confirming the behavior with a repeatable test.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- go
- Domain
- networking, performance, security
- Issue type
- Bug
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 30/100