Review Micall user interface

Richard H. had some ideas to improve the user interface on the QAI site. We should review the ideas with James, Conan, Chanson, and Celia. After reviewing the ideas, create smaller issues for each of the changes.

• Display the coloured scores for each region in a separate table that has the same layout as the raw and mapped counts table.
• Clicking on an entry in one of the tables should bring up the coverage map as it does today, plus the row of coloured scores for all the regions on that sample.
• Add a legend for the tables, particularly the error metrics. (Side 1, Side 2 down the left, and 1 - 14 across the top)
• Display error metrics to one decimal place.
• Two digits on the count of failed cycles in the error metrics table.
• Should we report the count of failed cycles or censored cycles? That is, if cycle 100 out of 250 fails, should we report 1 or 151?

More ideas from Jeff:

• Describe FASTA file header fields.
• Display file name and path for raw data

Review the existing tables, coverage map behavior, error metrics, and FASTA header display against the listed UI ideas. Resolve the open failed-versus-censored cycles question with the named collaborators, then create smaller issues for each agreed change; done means the review is complete and the work is decomposed.