Present output in a quality-control manner
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
enhancement
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 5
- Forks
- 4
- Avg merge
- 10h 7m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 5
Description
It would be nice to annotate detected errors with two additional pieces of info: Severity and Confidence.
See bandit for an example.
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start by locating the code that detects errors and presents their output; the issue does not name specific files, tests, or entry points. Review how Bandit represents Severity and Confidence, then define how both annotations should appear for each detected error and verify the output across the relevant detection cases.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- python
- Domain
- bioinformatics
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100