canonical / canonical/secboot

Possible bug? "no bootable paths with current EFI signature database"

Open
#172 0 comments 1 reaction 0 assignees View on GitHub
Dominant language
Go
Stars
23
Forks
29
Avg merge
2d 8h
Merged PRs (30d)
2

Description

Trying Ubuntu Core 20 (image created by myself) with secboot and disk encryption enabled, I get following fatal error message twice on initial setup:

```
taskrunner.go: 271: [change 2 "Setup system for run mode" task] failed: cannot make system runnable: cannot seal the encryption keys: cannot add EFI secure boot policy profile: cannot compute secure boot policy profile: no bootable paths with current EFI signature database.
```

The message is the same as in https://bugs.launchpad.net/intel/+bug/1938678/comments/39 .

In my setup, the UC20 disk is not the main hard drive (but making it the only drive does also not help) on the amd64/x86 box. I added the UC20 boot entries manually to the UEFI Boot setup.

Any idea if this is a bug in secboot or if some other system settings etc. need to be changed?

Contributor guide

Open the contributing guide

Assessment

This issue has not been assessed yet.

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.