canonical / canonical/imagecraft

Incorporate `mount` and `umount` from `imgmount.py` into `imagecraft` itself

Open
#95 0 comments 1 reaction 0 assignees View on GitHub
Dominant language
Python
Stars
32
Forks
17
Avg merge
1d 11h
Merged PRs (30d)
13

Description

> This is more a question for @upils than for you:

> Would this be worth having inside the imagecraft package, possibly with its own entrypoint? It might be nice in the snap to have `imagecraft.mount` and `imagecraft.umount` commands as separate entrypoints.

_Originally posted by @lengau in https://github.com/canonical/imagecraft/pull/94#discussion_r1965746785_

Contributor guide

Open the contributing guide

Research direction

Start by reviewing the mount and umount implementations in imgmount.py and how imagecraft currently exposes commands. Clarify whether they should be incorporated into the imagecraft package and whether separate snap entrypoints named imagecraft.mount and imagecraft.umount are required. Done means the intended command and packaging scope is agreed and implemented.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Tech stack
python
Domain
cli
Issue type
Feature
Difficulty
5/5
Estimated time
Over a week
Activity status
Stale
Clarity
Needs clarification
Newbie friendliness
25/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.