canonical / canonical/charm-integration-testing

[Investigate] `juju-jimm-k8s` has no log-proxy endpoint

Open
#499 2 comments 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub
bug bundle-generation charm-deployment
Dominant language
Python
Stars
6
Forks
1
Avg merge
1d 20h
Merged PRs (30d)
98

Description

The CharmTestProducer saw that jimm had a log-proxy endpoint, but it seems to have disappeared?

See: https://test-observer.canonical.com/#/charms/405573?testExecutionId=432326&testResultId=9844402

Investigate to ensure there is not a bug with our pipeline.

Again, it is possible that the test producer produces a test against the stable charm, after which the stable charm updates and the endpoint is removed. I *suspect* that is what occurred here.

Contributor guide

Open the contributing guide

Research direction

Start with the CharmTestProducer result at the linked Test Observer execution and inspect how the juju-jimm-k8s stable charm was selected and queried for the log-proxy endpoint. Compare the tested charm revision with the current stable charm to determine whether the pipeline reported stale data or the endpoint was actually removed. Done means documenting the cause and identifying the required follow-up.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Tech stack
kubernetes, python
Domain
devops, testing-qa
Issue type
Bug
Difficulty
4/5
Estimated time
3-5 days
Activity status
Quiet
Clarity
Needs clarification
Newbie friendliness
38/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.