caciviclab / caciviclab/ux

Assess whether the Alameda County, City Attorney of Oakland, Ballotpedia, or Smart Voter is best for populating text of ballot initiative

Open
#4 0 comments 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub
Dominant language
No language data
Stars
1
Forks
5
PR merge metrics
No merged PRs in 30d

Description

Smart Voter:
http://www.smartvoter.org/2009/07/21/ca/alm/meas/

Alameda Co: Not sorted by city, would have to sort out OAK measures
http://www.smartvoter.org/2012/11/06/ca/alm/meas/

City Attorney: Publishes text in PDFs - not helpful
http://www.oaklandcityattorney.org/PDFS/Measure%20Y%20ballot%20summary.pdf

Ballotpedia:
http://ballotpedia.org/Alameda_County,_California_ballot_measures

Contributor guide

No contributing guide indexed for this repository

Research direction

Review the linked Smart Voter, Alameda County, City Attorney, and Ballotpedia sources, comparing how accessible and usable their ballot-initiative text is. Document which source best supports populating the text and record the relevant limitations, including city sorting and PDF formats.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Domain
content
Issue type
Feature
Difficulty
4/5
Estimated time
3-5 days
Activity status
Stale
Clarity
Needs clarification
Newbie friendliness
25/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.