bytedance / bytedance/SIFThinker
Question about depth reward
Open
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 14
- Forks
- 2
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
Hi, thank you for open-sourcing this great work. I have a quick clarification about the GRPO-SIF setup. In the current prompt, the model is asked to output interleaved and , but it does not seem to explicitly require a "depth" field inside each JSON item. Meanwhile, the depth_consistency reward appears to depend on parsing that depth value. Could this mismatch be the reason why depth reward is often 0? I would really appreciate your guidance on whether this is expected or if the prompt should explicitly enforce depth output.
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
Assessment
This issue has not been assessed yet.