bytedance / bytedance/ComfyUI_InfiniteYou
Infinite you
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 299
- Forks
- 52
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
When I ran the workflow from the example folder ,I received this warring:Workflow Validation
184 is funky... target(51).inputs[0].link is NOT correct (is 185), but origin(47).outputs[0].links contains it
> [PATCH] target(51).inputs[0].link is defined, removing 184 from origin(47).outputs[0].links.
180 is funky... origin(105).outputs[0].links does NOT contain it, but target(109).inputs[4].link does.
> [PATCH] Attempt a fix by adding this 180 to origin(105).outputs[0].links.
184 is def invalid; BOTH origin node 47 doesn't have 184 and 47 target node doesn't have 184.
Deleting link #184.
splicing 21 from links
Made 2 node link patches, and 1 stale link removals.
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
Research direction
Start by running the workflow from the example folder and reproducing the Workflow Validation warning. Trace the reported origin and target nodes and their link IDs, especially links 184 and 180, to determine why their declarations disagree. Done means the workflow no longer reports these inconsistent or stale links.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- python
- Domain
- tooling
- Issue type
- Bug
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100