buildingSMART / buildingSMART/NextGen-IFC
IfcLoop and IfcVertex are not ABSTRACT?
- Dominant language
- TeX
- Stars
- 64
- Forks
- 4
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
Description of the proposal:
Make `IfcLoop` and `IfcVertex` entities abstract.
They do not possess any attributes, therefore I don't see any reason to see them in a physical file. E.g.:
> #90 = IFCLOOP();
Therefore: make them `ABSTRACT`.
What do we win: clearer schema.
What do we loose: nothing.
Schema impact: backward compatible, I would even suggest updating the old schemas as well.
Instance model impact: No chance to submit a file with entities like `IfcLoop` and/or `IfcVertex`.
Backwards compatible: Yes.
Automatic migration possible: ?
Additional implications: ?
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
Assessment
This issue has not been assessed yet.