buildingSMART / buildingSMART/NextGen-IFC
Should the next version of IFC adopt the latest version of STEP?
- Dominant language
- TeX
- Stars
- 64
- Forks
- 4
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
Description of the proposal:
IFC2x3 and IFC4 still refer to an older version of STEP. Should IFC5 STEP serialization and schema concepts adopt the new 2016 version?
Describe how it contributes to the objectives set in https://github.com/buildingSMART/NextGen-IFC/wiki/Towards-a-technology-independent-IFC:
What do we win:
1. Referencing
2. UTF-8
3. ...
(need more elaboration)
What do we loose
Schema impact:
Allow external referencing of other IFC files
Instance model impact:
Ability to link multiple instance files
Backwards compatible:
No
Automatic migration possible:
No
Additional implications:
-
Note that not all points need to be satisfied!
Backwards compatibility and file size are not concerns.
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
Assessment
This issue has not been assessed yet.