buildingSMART / buildingSMART/IFC4.x-development
IfcGroup.IsGroupedBy
Open
after-NWI
iso-compatibility
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 234
- Forks
- 123
- Avg merge
- 15h 4m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 5
Description
Is `IsGroupedBy` the correct name for the inverse relationships on IfcGroup? Shouldn't it be called something like `Groups` instead?
Contributor guide
Research direction
Start by reviewing the IFC4.x specification entry for IfcGroup and its IsGroupedBy inverse relationship. Check the surrounding relationship naming conventions and determine whether the proposed Groups name preserves the intended meaning; done means the naming question has a documented, agreed resolution.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Domain
- documentation
- Issue type
- Documentation
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100