buildingSMART / buildingSMART/IFC4.x-development
Why is there inconsistent naming for construction resources?
Open
allocated-core
allocated-cost
allocated-fm
allocated-sequence
ifc-update-out
iso-compatibility
proposal
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 234
- Forks
- 123
- Avg merge
- 15h 4m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 5
Description
https://forums.buildingsmart.org/t/why-is-there-inconsistent-naming-for-construction-resources/3551
Propose to remove Construction prefix. Adds no value. Also used in FM usecases.
Classes on the left have a construction prefix. Classes on the right do not. Why?
Two of the non-prefixed classes are hinted to be “root-level”. Is IfcLaborResource also potentially a root-level? Should the prefixes be there, if the parent already says IfcConstructionResource?
2021-04-25-120944_926x307_scrot
2021-04-25-120944_926x307_scrot926×307 45.8 KB
Contributor guide
Assessment
This issue has not been assessed yet.