buildingSMART / buildingSMART/IFC4.x-development
Qto_*BaseQuantities naming
Open
ifc-update-out
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 234
- Forks
- 123
- Avg merge
- 15h 4m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 5
Description
There are 3 cases where the quantity-set isn't named according to the rule Qto_*BaseQuantities:
Qto_BuildingElementProxyQuantities
Qto_CurtainWallQuantities
Qto_PictorialSignQuantities
Is there a reason for the missing **Base** term?
Contributor guide
Research direction
Compare Qto_BuildingElementProxyQuantities, Qto_CurtainWallQuantities, and Qto_PictorialSignQuantities with the Qto_*BaseQuantities naming rule in the IFC4.x specification. Check the surrounding quantity-set definitions for the reason the Base term is absent; done when the naming rationale or a consistent naming decision is documented.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Domain
- documentation
- Issue type
- Documentation
- Difficulty
- 2/5
- Estimated time
- 1-3 hours
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 45/100