boostorg / boostorg/smart_ptr

Is there any plan for standardizing `local_shared_ptr`?

Open
#106 3 comments 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub
Dominant language
C++
Stars
111
Forks
116
PR merge metrics
No merged PRs in 30d

Description

I'm sorry for bothering here. This is not an issue for **`boost::`**`local_shared_ptr`.

Arthur O'Dwyer said that `local_shared_ptr` has been rejected for standardization (on [std-proposals](https://lists.isocpp.org/std-proposals/2020/07/1569.php)). But it seems that there's not even a P-paper for it.

I wonder whether the standardization is really rejected, and if not, whether there is any plan for it.

Contributor guide

No contributing guide indexed for this repository

Assessment

This issue has not been assessed yet.

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.