Boost.Any allocator support RFC
- Dominant language
- C++
- Stars
- 37
- Forks
- 60
- Avg merge
- 5d 22h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 1
Description
Right now it is possible to use Boost.Any with types that require special alignment (sse intrinsics, Eigen3 data types, ...) by overriding the global operators new and delete. This solution is far from optimal, since it results in everything in the whole program being overaligned.
I'm opening this Request For Comments to discuss a possibly better solution to this problem.
The gist of the idea is for Boost.Any to store a polymorphic allocator (of possibly zero size), such that the user can provide an allocator when initializing/assigning/copying an any object.
This increases the API of Boost.Any (changes proposed below). It also decreases its performance, since allocating/deallocating memory would incur an extra virtual function call. It might also increase the size of the any object. One has, however, to consider the impact of the current workarounds in larger programs. Over-aligning all allocations might have a larger impact on performance and memory footprint than the proposed changes.
I think the following interface should be enough:
```
any(polymorphic_allocator allocator = default_allocator());
any(const any &, polymorphic_allocator allocator = default_allocator());
any(any &&, polymorphic_allocator allocator = default_allocator());
template any(const ValueType &, polymorphic_allocator allocator = default_allocator());
template any(ValueType &&, polymorphic_allocator allocator = default_allocator());
```
----
Issue imported from https://svn.boost.org/trac10/ticket/11045
Reported by: gonzalobg88@…
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
Research direction
The RFC names no source files, tests, or entry points. Start by reviewing the proposed Boost.Any allocator constructors and the stated alignment, performance, and object-size trade-offs; done means an agreed API and implementation direction.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- cpp
- Domain
- devtools
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100