bitshares / bitshares/bitshares-ui

Suggestion to abstract away IndexedDB requirement

Open
#2,455 5 comments 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub
[1a] Epic [2] Needs Discussion [3] Refactoring [4a] Low Priority [5d] Large help wanted
Dominant language
JavaScript
Stars
520
Forks
575
Avg merge
12h 7m
Merged PRs (30d)
5

Description

Right now, the UI depends heavily on IndexedDB being available using it as a live DB during normal operation (and not only for persistance).

This causes problems in browsers that disable IndexedDB access in private/incognito mode such as Firefox.

I suggest we use an in-mem abstraction for data storage during normal operation and only use IndexedDB or localStorage for persistence between sessions.

One option would be something like: https://github.com/agershun/alasql

Contributor guide

Open the contributing guide

Research direction

Start by locating the UI's IndexedDB usage and persistence paths; the issue names no files or tests. Compare the current live-storage behavior with an in-memory approach, then verify that sessions still persist through IndexedDB or localStorage and that normal operation works when IndexedDB is unavailable.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Tech stack
javascript
Domain
database, frontend
Issue type
Refactor
Difficulty
5/5
Estimated time
Over a week
Activity status
Stale
Clarity
Needs clarification
Newbie friendliness
25/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.