Thought: Using the Checklist to bridge the communication gap
- Dominant language
- JavaScript
- Stars
- 154
- Forks
- 29
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
Specifically between different groups int he same team. i.e. Backend vs frontend vs devops vs users
I'm thinking that in certain questions, we can easily and quickly discover terminology differences between the different groups. By documenting these differences, we can iron out future issues that result from terminology confusion.
Saying something is on the "dev" server, for example, can mean different things to different groups.
I don't think the checklist is a place to capture this information but I think it's a starting point. Although, we should have a question asking if the team has a "Ubiquitous language" document.
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
Research direction
No file, test, or entry point is named. Review the existing checklist content and the proposal about documenting terminology differences and adding a question about a “Ubiquitous language” document; the work is done only after the scope and intended checklist change are agreed.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Domain
- documentation
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 20/100