bisq-network / bisq-network/support
Reimbursement for trade 4QF5BMW
- Dominant language
- HTML
- Stars
- 19
- Forks
- 13
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
>_The screenshot from the Bisq client must have the **Trade ID**, **Deposit**, **Maker** and **Taker** TXIDs visible. Of course some trades do not have all 3 types, that is ok. Make sure all private information is covered (like bank accounts, name, etc). **Do not upload images where sensitive private data is visible!**_
Reimbursement for trade 4QF5BMW
I am BTC buyer as taker for EUR.
Trade amount and asset: [AMOUNT] BTC for [X ASSET]
Deposit amount: 0.0003 BTC
Maker: 685d0b5e9fae16916ddb2b2d9cf02ca748f0ba8c7a8d5d1ca154f5b1d15dcab0
Taker: d30d7f0aa06ffb4afd521435ce69b231a92e3ba7fb3aa8e2b0853305e2b7bb7a
Deposit: 0.0003 BTC
Mining fee: 0.000033090 BTC
Delayed payout: ..........
BuyerMultiSigPubKeyHex: ..........
SellerMultiSigPubKeyHex: ..........
Reimbursement amount: 0.000339 BTC
Reason for reimbursement: BuyerVerifiesPreparedDelayedPayoutTx
BTC address ownership proof:
>_Repeat the above for each trade you need to be reimbursed_
>_A reimbursement request has to contain textual representation of **Maker**, **Taker** and **Deposit** TXIDs (copy them from the client to the issue). **All TXIDs that are visible in the screenshot must be copied to the issue in text form! Please use exact form for Maker/Taker/Deposit - no abbreviations like M:, T: or adding extra characters like "Maker TX:", etc. Leave those fields as they are and replace the "........" with the appropreate txid**_
Bisq version: Bisq-64bit-1.10.6
>_Provide the Bisq client version to help developers identify the causing issue._
Other notes:
>_Issue [#197](https://github.com/bisq-network/support/issues/197) can be used as a good example of a correct reimbursement request._
>_Ping @refund-agent2 and your mediator_
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
Research direction
No repository files, tests, or code entry points are identified. This issue is a trade reimbursement request for Bisq version 1.10.6, requiring maintainer review of the transaction details and reimbursement reason rather than a newcomer code change.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Domain
- payments
- Issue type
- Bug
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Active
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 15/100