Error in sdrf-pipelines and PRIDE validators

Currently, the sdrf-pipelines allow that in the comments columns of the SDRF (the instrument/data properties) the user can use free text this is needed for example for some terms like precursor and fragment tolerances or other columns but some columns such as PTMS, instruments, enzymes etc could be validated against PSI ontology. The PRIDE validator does that creating inconsistencies between the python SDRF validator and the PRIDE java validator.

During the PSI meeting (April 2025), we should refine and review the specifications, and terms like RECOMMENDED and try to align the specifications and the validators to make sure that everything is in sync.