bethgelab / bethgelab/foolbox

Inconsistence in attacking returns

Open
#644 5 comments 0 reactions 1 assignee Claimed by @zimmerrol View on GitHub
enhancement
Dominant language
Python
Stars
3k
Forks
442
PR merge metrics
No merged PRs in 30d

Description

The very example at your [official website](https://foolbox.jonasrauber.de/) is taking the first return as advs.

![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/33188338/133294532-d6083b17-3bc1-43ae-a548-ac3aa86e8e59.png)

Well, the latest attack method suggests using the second return as the better option (clipped).
![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/33188338/133294633-e34c7699-4772-443f-b7db-d63ed8036ce9.png)

I think it is better to make this more clear for users.

Thanks.

Contributor guide

No contributing guide indexed for this repository

Assessment

This issue has not been assessed yet.

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.