Add an MSIX packaging option for Windows
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 3.3k
- Forks
- 549
- Avg merge
- 1d 4h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 40
Description
### What is the problem or limitation you are having?
Windows appears to have added a new app distribution format - [MSIX](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/msix/). This format appears to be preferred for some usages, so it should be supported by Briefcase.
### Describe the solution you'd like
`briefcase package windows -p msix` should be a valid packaging command.
### Describe alternatives you've considered
Do nothing, continue to support MSI and ZIP packaging.
### Additional context
Our existing WIX tooling needs to be upgraded (see #1185), but WiX documentation is... not great.
The documentation of MSIX is... dense, and doesn't spend a lot of time explaining how MSIX fits into the existing MSI ecosystem. However, from an initial read, it appears that MSIX might (maybe?) be compatible with Windows App Store distribution.
Another advantage of MSIX appears to be that Microsoft itself is providing the tooling to build the installers, so we don't need to rely on a badly documented third-party tool to meet Windows packaging needs.
The first step to progress this will be to investigate the new format and tools and see what is involved in turning a "directory of content" into a signed MSIX installer.
Contributor guide
Research direction
Start with the `briefcase package windows -p msix` entry point and investigate the MSIX format and Microsoft’s packaging and signing tools. Review the existing MSI and ZIP packaging paths, along with WIX tooling upgrade issue #1185; done means the command is accepted and produces a signed MSIX installer from the application content.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- python
- Domain
- build-system
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Quiet
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100