Use Grigorten formula for ssd_ecd()
- Dominant language
- R
- Stars
- 39
- Forks
- 21
- Avg merge
- 9h 38m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 2
Description
From email from David Fox
> I personally think we should be using the Gringorten formula (replace both 0.375 and 0.25 with 0.44 in the formula above) as it has better tail behaviour for the type of distributions we are dealing with.
> ssd_ecd(1:10)
```
[1] 0.06097561 0.15853659 0.25609756 0.35365854 0.45121951 0.54878049 0.64634146 0.74390244 0.84146341
[10] 0.93902439
```
```
((1:10) - 0.375) / (10.25)
[1] 0.06097561 0.15853659 0.25609756 0.35365854 0.45121951 0.54878049 0.64634146 0.74390244 0.84146341
[10] 0.93902439
```
> # Gringorten
```
((1:10) - 0.44) / (10.44)
[1] 0.05363985 0.14942529 0.24521073 0.34099617 0.43678161 0.53256705 0.62835249 0.72413793 0.81992337
[10] 0.91570881
```
Contributor guide
Assessment
This issue has not been assessed yet.