accessPoints of addresses on small lots close to their named road are far away from where they should be
- Dominant language
- Java
- Stars
- 17
- Forks
- 7
- Avg merge
- 10h 2m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 15
Description
At least 250 civic addresses in geocoder have an accessPoint that is more than 100m from its parcelPoint. Some of these parcels are small and close to the road so there is no good reason why the accessPoint should be [so far away](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=umvblNSqt2s).
Here are some examples:
|address|Investigated|Notes|
|---|---|---|
890 Tabor Blvd, Prince George, BC|No|There is a second Tabor Blvd that the access point is close to
14523 16 ave, Surrey, BC|Yes|16 ave is also North Bluff Rd
14523 NORTH BLUFF RD, Surrey, BC |Yes| best match is 14523 16 ave surrey bc, not 14253 North bluff Rd
1749 Hwy 33, Kelowna, BC|no| best match is 1749 Hwy 33 E, Kelowna, BC
205 1ST ST, Courtenay, BC|Yes| 205, 231, 257,267,275, 307 have no accessPoint near parcel; there are two 1st st in courtenay
7460 HEATHER ST, Vancouver, BC|Yes|since this is only a block match, there is no parcelPoint and this address has a valid accessPoint
41105 TANTALUS RD, Squamish, BC|No|
625 E 3RD ST, North Vancouver, BC|No|
17905 X STREAM RD, Mount Currie, BC|No|
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
Assessment
This issue has not been assessed yet.